September 2, 2007 Archives

I am a photographer. That's my hobby.

I'm a good photographer. I've seen the work of great photographers. Their best shots are better than my best shots. I'm OK with that.

I take a lot of care with the mechanics of my photography. I try and think through shutter speed, aperture, lens focal length and film speed (it's still called that) before I press the shutter. I don't always get it right, but at least I think about it.

As a photographer there is a question I'm asked all the time. In fact, I received this yesterday:

Let me repeat the operative part: your camera seems to take really great pictures.

I know the writer meant well. I would guess every photographer gets asked this question from time-to-time. It misses the point. It used to bother me. Oh hell, it still bothers me, but I've gotten used to it.

There is an excellent shot of Helaine, Steffie and me, taken a few years ago in Newport, RI. The sky had turned blood red at sunset. I've never seen anything like it.

I set the camera and handed it to a passerby. His shot was great, but it's really my shot. If he would have just pointed and shot, the effect wouldn't have been as vivid. I took the picture!

My camera is a Canon Digital Rebel. It's the original 300D. I usually carry 4 lenses which go from 10 to 300mm.

It takes better pictures than when I first got it.