Huge Changes In Television

If you have a working 1950 DuMont TV, you can still use it today! Let’s see how much software your five year old computer will run!

DumontTV.jpgA huge change in television is about a year away on February 19, 2009. Most likely, you will not be affected.

The analog TV channels, some of which have carried broadcasts for 60 (or more) years will be shut down. Television will move to new digital channels, all of which are already broadcasting in parallel today.

The reason you won’t care about this change is, cable TV and satellite providers will convert the digital signal for you. An overwhelming majority of Americans get their TV signal from a provider, not off-the-air. Your old set will still work fine, unless you’re using an antenna on your roof or rabbit ears.

This will be a sad moment, because it eliminates a system which allows any TV ever made to still be used! Amazingly, every change to TV over the years has been accomplished without making old sets obsolete. Those days are over.

When color TV first came on the scene, it was called compatible color, because the TV signal was altered in such a way that black and white sets would still work just fine. The same was the case when stereo sound was introduced.

If you have a working 1950 DuMont TV at home, you can still use it today! Let’s see how much software your five year old computer will run… or where you can play your 8-track tapes!

For TV stations, this is a huge burden coming at the very same time their profitability is threatened by new media. Building a transmission facility for digital broadcasting is a huge financial undertaking, especially when you remember nearly no one watches over-the-air.

On top of that, at some point local stations will also have to begin originating HDTV. Right now, most just pass through what the networks provide. Local programming like news and syndicated show are still sent in the old school standard definition, with its four by three format.

All these capital expenses will be undertaken without a real understanding of potential ongoing demand. Do you really want to see me that clearly?

As the off switches are thrown across the country next February, new operators will be standing by with new services. The FCC is in the middle of auctioning off these TV frequencies which will be abandoned.

The original station operators got them for free! We were much more innocent back then. Now they’ll bring tens of billions of dollars and come with many strings attached.

I don’t know where TV will be five or ten years from now. Computers are becoming more adept at delivering video content. Maybe that’s the logical platform?

Will there be enough bandwidth if everyone decides to watch online? Some experts are saying no… but no one really knows.

I don’t see anyone predicting where TV will be a decade from now.

6 thoughts on “Huge Changes In Television”

  1. I would assume, as cable/satellite ops start relaying the digital signal, what the viewers sees will improve. Digital TV does not suffer multipath problems (ghosting) and should be easier to keep clean.

  2. “On top of that, at some point local stations will also have to begin originating HDTV. Right now, most just pass through what the networks provide. Local programming like news and syndicated show are still sent in the old school standard definition, with its four by three format.”

    Actually Geoff, I don’t think there is ANY requirement for stations to ever produce local HD content, we just all have to be broadcasting in digital (ATSC). Digital does not always mean HDTV. I would doubt that a lot of small market stations have any plans to go HD and will just keep upconverting local SD programming, especially news.

    -Adam

  3. Adam,

    You are correct.

    My language was imprecise. I meant they would have to originate in HDTV as a competitive response, not a legal requirement.

  4. “nearly no one watches over-the-air”

    We in the suburbs, with our cable and satellite won’t notice it at all. But in the cities, especially the larger ones, folks who never had cable will bite the bullet on this one. In NYC alone, an apartment dweller with rabbit ears can receive quite a few channels, all the network stuff and PBS too. That particular person will be forced to spend money for a converter. It isn’t a lot of money, it’s truly the principle in this instance. The government, probably in a fleeting moment of guilt, has reduced the price for these boxes. Still, it irks me that a person, maybe disabled or on a fixed income, perhaps retired, needs to pay up. As the FCC continues to squash the radio band and sell it off for profit, the little guy gets squeezed out.

    What’s next, having to pay a fee, either once or monthly, for AM or FM? I hope the ham bands aren’t up for grabs.

  5. Copying from this website:

    http://www.ntia.doc.gov/dtvcoupon/

    As of January 1, 2008, all U.S. households are eligible to request up to two coupons, worth $40 each, to be used toward the purchase of up to two, digital-to-analog converter boxes.

    ______

    ( From someone who gets bad reception and only 2 to 4 channels, depending on the weather and how the wind is blowing the antenna, etc.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *