I Need A New Vice

I play poker online. This is no secret. I’ve written about it dozens of times.

I enjoy playing poker, as I have for over 30 years. I’m reasonably proficient, meaning the $250 Helaine and I deposited three years ago is still intact (profit… not so much).

Now a law has been passed making it illegal to do financial transactions with my online casino.

I’m 56. I have never bet more than I could afford to lose – never. After three years, I’m even, so we can assume the ‘house’ is honest. Exactly who am I hurting?

So this vice has been removed from my life (or soon will be). Thanks.

Yes, I’m ticked.

Excellent, that was really well explained and helpful

This evening I came across a posting I made months ago on some computer magazine’s website. The content of my entry is unimportant.

The story came out in September, as did my comment. There were other comments after mine, then a pause for a month and, “Excellent, that was really well explained and helpful.”

I’m smelling something funny here.

When people comment they usually say and add something. This was too nondescript. I looked closer.

The posting was from “online casino.” BINGO!

Next I went to Google and searched the exact phrase, in quotes, plus the word “casino.” That would give me a fairly good idea how many times this comment spamming trick was successful&#185


It looks like nearly 9,000 link placements. In an environment where links from site-to-site are important, this is cheap, if not sleazy advertising. It is part of the downside of removing human intervention from qualitative judgments.

&#185 – Searching within quotation marks only returns the exact phrase you’ve included. Searching without quotation marks will allow returns that have the words, though in a different order or context. Looking at the number of hits when you’re searching without quotation marks is meaningless.

A Year of Online Poker

It was about a year ago that, like an idiot, I went to Stop and Shop, bought a Western Union Money Order, and sent it off to Coast Rica! That $250 was our stake to play a little poker. Who would have thought, a year later, it’s still there – and larger than when we began?

It’s time for the backstory. I had been playing poker very infrequently for 20 years or more. I thought I was good. I was awful. Since I didn’t play often, I didn’t lose much. It was harmless fun.

With two casinos in Connecticut, I was invited to a Press Poker Tournament for charity. It was the kickoff to Foxwoods’ World Poker Finals. Somehow, entirely by luck, I came in near the top and won $1,000 for Blue Jeans for Babies.

I am not being modest. It was luck – blind luck&#185.

As the day progressed and the tables were consolidated, I found myself playing with Jan Fisher of Cardplayer Magazine. I had no idea who she was, but when I found out I wanted her to tell me how I played.

I was waiting for some nice words of encouragement – but she said nothing. She thought I played poorly, but was looking for a way not to say it.

Jan Fisher turned me around as a poker player. She doesn’t know she did, and I’ve never thanked her. If you see her, tell her.

By the time August of 2003 came along, I had tightened up my game enough to break even. Considering the house takes a cut of every pot, that’s not bad.

It didn’t take me long playing online before I realized I’d have to tighten up and be even more disciplined. I did. Though to this day, my biggest losses still come when I lose my sense of discipline.

With a computer, it is possible to play hundreds of hands of poker a day – often while doing other things at the same time. This is the kind of experience that good players used to take years to get.

We now sit with $900 of profit (could be more or less – I’m playing now). I won’t quit my day job. I have to believe that’s as good or better than 70-80% of the other people playing online. The online casino has collected thousands and thousands of dollars in fees while I’ve played. They were taken from me, but replenished by others.

The most important part is, I still enjoy the game. I get frustrated when I play poorly. I enjoy being strategic when it helps me win.

&#185 – As I got closer and closer to placing in the money, I became more and more nervous. Playing for big stakes, even when it’s not your own money, is nerve wracking.

My First Tourney Payout – Not Much

The online casino I play poker at is loaded with tournaments. Usually I play one table affairs where the last three standing cash out. But, that’s not the only way they’re dealt.

Every day, there are open tournaments. Pluck down the entry fee and you’re in! Some are free – with a cash prize. Others are satellites, qualifying you to play in more expensive tournaments without paying any more money. When it comes to these massive tournaments, I never look above the $1 or $3 level. It’s just a way to kill time.

Tonight, I entered a $1 tournament along with 1167 others. Someone was going to go home with over $250 on a $1 bet. Most would get nothing.

The game was Hold’em, no limit. Each player gets $1,500 in chips and plays from there.

I set my computer up with the tournament table over the ‘lobby’. I positioned the screen in such a way that I could watch the countdown as players started getting knocked off.

For the first few minutes it was slow. The first out in these tournaments is usually on the first hand… and usually someone who will later say, “Bad cards don’t kill you. It’s good cards that will do you in.” My guess is, a lot of players retiring early are doing so with a pair of aces that didn’t hold.

I watched the numbers ratchet through 1,000 and then 900 and 800. I was playing well but always below the middle of the pack moneywise.

The ante rose every fifteen minutes and there’d be a spurt of players tapped out. “Conservative,” I kept saying to myself. Not losing is more important than winning.

By the time we got down to 250 players, I was looking at what the tournament paid. Yes, the winner gets paid well, but it’s like falling off a cliff after that. By the time you’re at number 10, you’re down to $10.52.

I didn’t care. I wanted to make money. How much wasn’t important.

The numbers continued down. 200, 150, 130, 120. I looked at my stack. I had enough to break 99, where the payouts started, if I just sat and folded. I wasn’t getting anything to play anyway.

110, 109, 108, 107… the numbers were moving slower. No one wanted to be the last out before getting something. 106, 105, 104, 103. It struck me that I’d have to do something stupid at this point to get blown out.

102, 101, 100, 99, EUREKA!

A text message flashed on the table. At this point, all the tables would be synchronized. We’d play hand for hand. God forbid someone would play s-l-o-w-l-y and make an extra few cents.

There were prize breaks at 81 and 61. I blew by both and had nearly $30,000 in chips. And then, it happened.

I went in with a good hand and met up with a spectacular one. I lost, all-in, to a pair of Aces.

After playing 3:15, I finished 50th!

I had outlasted 1118 others and had won… this is going to sound so stupid… I won the grand total of…. hold on, here’s the email:

PokerStars Tournament #657810, No Limit Hold’em

Super Satellite

Buy-In: $1.00

1168 players

Total Prize Pool: $1168.00

Target Tournament #624430

9 tickets to the target tournament

Tournament started – 2003/12/13 – 23:30:00 (ET)

Dear ctwxman,

You finished the tournament in 50th place.

A $2.92 award has been credited to your Real Money account.

You earned 53.02 tournament leader points in this tournament.

For information about our tournament leader board, see our web site at

http://www.pokerstars.com/tlb_tournament_rankings.htm

Congratulations!

Thank you for participating.

I have no clue what 53.02 tournament points gets me. You can be sure, however, it’s not as good as that $1.92 net profit! Ah, the sweet smell of filthy lucre.