Using Cars To Help Forecast Weather

Automobiles are already equipped with useful temperature and pressure sensors; simple rain and wind sensors could be readily added.

I’m not sure how I got on the mailing list to receive “Imaging Notes,” but I did. It’s a glossy magazine dedicated to “Earth Remote Sensing for Security, Energy and the Environment.”

It is geek porn as companies and suppliers show off their ability to sense and photograph the Earth from satellites. Spectacular images are the norm.

I was thumbing through my copy yesterday when I came across a small inset on the editorial page: “Sensing severe weather from automobiles.”

auto info on radar.jpgThe Doppler radar map on the left shows a typical display augmented by data from cars! How simple. How amazingly powerful!

“A distinct change in wind direction is observed by the automobile as it approaches the storm center, indicating inflows at ground level characteristic of tornado formation. This information is not available from either the fixed weather stations or the Doppler radar. Automobiles are already equipped with useful temperature and pressure sensors; simple rain and wind sensors could be readily added. Drawing data from the community of millions of vehicles on the road would complement our centralized satellite and ground-based weather data sources, enabling us to forecast development of severe weather and micro-weather with unprecedented accuracy.

Google’s new traffic data is already integrating realtime data from moving vehicles to enhance the utility of its product. Why not do the same to help initialize our weather models?

I can’t tell you how many times I’ve talked with meteorologist friends about data initialization being a weak link in weather prediction. We just have too few observations to use. It would seem for short term predictions a dense carpet of additional observations might greatly increase our accuracy.

This still doesn’t put more sensors in the oceans or other inhospitable places, so the global and extended range implications seem minor. For thunderstorms, tornadoes and even the development of winter storms this could make a huge difference.

It’s the first I’ve heard of this at all.

Ballot Follow-Up

Still it’s eating at me. I sent a note to Connecticut’s Secretary of State, who I do not know personally.

I spoke to a few people after yesterday’s posting about my town’s ballot. Some people saw my point–not everyone. No one felt it was as serious a problem as I did.

Still it’s eating at me. I sent a note to Connecticut’s Secretary of State, who I do not know personally.

Dear Secretary Bysiewicz,

I am writing to ask about yesterday’s ballot. I live in Hamden, but I suspect my concern is statewide.

In our vote for council-at-large and school board there were eight candidates for four positions. The demarcation of individual columns and numbering (9a, 9b, 10a, 10b not 9,10,11,12) imply you may not vote for a candidate directly above or below another candidate you’ve already voted for. Even though the ballot said “Vote for any four” the implication is otherwise and I suspect many people were confused as I originally was.

A simple statistical analysis of the ballots will show if I am correct. On ballots with split ticket voting in multiple candidate offices did the candidate above or below a candidate who received a vote get a statistically equal proportion of the vote? I suspect they did not. I’d be willing to bet they did not.

This is a non-partisan issue. I don’t believe either party benefited. However, a candidate running directly above or below someone with strong name recognition would be unfairly penalized. That would be wrong.

Thank you for your time in considering this. I hope to hear your thoughts.

Sincerely,

Geoff Fox

I guessed at her email address. It hasn’t come bouncing back to me so I’ll hope it was received.

I’ll update as/if necessary.

Is A Flaw In The Ballot Connecticut’s Butterfly?

It’s likely with all the elections going on in the state someone’s getting jobbed by this. I hope not, but I’m a realist. People vote without reading.

I voted today, but I’m not totally happy about the process. There’s a flaw in the ballot which will leave some people with the wrong impression and others just confused. It’s possible votes will be miscast or candidates deprived of potential votes.

This isn’t the kind of thing which benefits one party over the other, but it does penalize anyone with the bad luck to be placed over or under a candidate with good name recognition.

Is this another butterfly ballot debacle? Maybe. I think it is significant.

hamden ballot 2009.jpgIn my town an example is the vote for members of the School Board. Eight candidates presented in two rows and four columns. It seems logical that if you vote for one candidate in a column you shouldn’t be able to vote for the other–but you can!

Yes, there’s an instruction to vote for any four candidates, but I think the history of voting for just one candidate in a column trumps anything written. That’s reinforced by the candidates being ‘numbered’ as 9a, 9b, 10a, 10b, etc. And, since this is now a paper ballot using an optical scanner there’s no longer the reassurance of seeing if the lever will pull.

This is just plain bad. There has to be a better solution, though I don’t know what it is.

It’s likely with all the elections going on in the state someone’s getting jobbed by this. I hope not, but I’m a realist. People vote without reading.

That last sentence originally read “Lots of people vote without reading,” but my polling place was an invitation only crowd. Such a shame. I don’t think I’ve missed a single election since 1972.

sixth grade bakesale.jpgIn other election news… the sixth grade class at the elementary school where I vote has taken to holding an election day bake school. Smart kids! They get a captive audience hungry or guilty or possibly both.

Soon they’ll come to school in a Lexus school bus.

The Coffee Maker I Wouldn’t Buy Again

In the meantime, this thing is so well built it will bring Helaine and me years of frustration as we hand clean tiny pieces coated with coffee dust.

cuisinart-dgb-650.jpgIn our kitchen sits a Cuisinart DGB-650 coffee maker. It’s a pretty substantial piece of hardware which grinds fresh beans then brews coffee. The coffee it makes is excellent.

We would not buy one again!

You would think Cuisinart (actually part of Conair) knows kitchen appliances. And yet this one so disappoints I have to get it off my chest.

cuisinart-coffee-maker-parts.jpgThat’s a photo of my sink with the seven–that’s right seven–pieces that get washed each time the coffee maker makes coffee. Some are oddly shaped pieces. At least two are so weirdly shaped it’s difficult to clean them! And,of course, the more difficult it is, the more time consuming it is and frustrating.

On top of that there’s always some splatter or drip that gets on the exterior surface of the unit itself. Maybe it’s me, though I suspect it’s the design.

I wrote Cuisinart in August and, to their credit, they responded. But seriously, this isn’t a field they’re just entering. Doesn’t anyone ‘play test’ these to make sure they both work and are practical?

We would like to think all of our customers are satisfied customers. But we rely on hearing from concerned consumers, such as yourself, if we are not providing you with the product you have come to depend on for quality and value. It always concerns us when we hear of a product that has not met this criteria.

We are truly sorry to hear you are not satisfied with the results you have received with the DGB-650. Rest assured your comments will be passed along to our Marketing, Engineering and Quality Assurance Groups for review.

I hope they did.

In the meantime, this thing is so well built it will bring Helaine and me years of frustration as we hand clean tiny pieces coated with coffee dust.

I needed to get this off my chest.

Moving Through Fall, Rapidly

This year’s colors aren’t as vibrant. There are few reds and even the yellows and oranges are shaded toward brown.

Yesterday’s weather was wet and awful. Today’s was nicer but chilly. With Standard Time back the Sun set very early.

No doubt we’re deep into fall and all the early signs of winter are in place.

Last weekend I went up on Sleeping Giant and reveled in the foliage. This weekend, in my own yard, the look isn’t quite as uplifting. Dead leaves are everywhere.

This year’s colors aren’t as vibrant. There are few reds and the yellows and oranges are shaded toward brown. In another week or two even those leaves will be gone. If you look up some of the trees are already nearly bare.

With any hint of a breeze it begins raining leaves!

In Connecticut spring comes gradually. Fall, on the other hand, is in a hurry to get here and be gone.

We’ve started to show “glad that’s not me” snow video on the news. How long until they’ll be laughing at us from somewhere else?

yellow-leaves-backyard.jpg

long-branch-with-yellow-leaves-backyard.jpg

brown-leaves-backyard.jpg

bare-branches-front-yard.jpg