I have no training in this. It’s all self taught… incompletely self taught!
It was 5:30 AM by the time I got to bed this morning. Helaine’s extra unencumbered sleep was courtesy of my blog redesign. I hit a problem around 3:45 AM. If left alone my worry was I’d never be able to unravel it.
I have no training in this. It’s all self taught… incompletely self taught! Every time I code I find more I don’t know.
My goal is cleaner and bolder. Over time websites deteriorate and lose their tightness¹. This one has.
There are many similarities between the new and old look. I suppose that’s unavoidable. At the same time there are lots of differences. Some are visible, but many lie in the invisible way the blog functions… how it’s feed if you will.
The new look runs on WordPress using a theme based on “Byty,” itself a child theme which runs under the Thematic framework. That last sentence was just to show how meticulously detailed and arcane the whole process is.
Nothing is straightforward. Nothing is where I expect it to be. Here’s a link to the home page with some bells and whistles revealed.
I threw up my hands and spent some quality time on the phone with Gary Choronzy. Gary often serves as my website guru since those things I lost sleep over Gary can do in his sleep!
Most (not all) of the styling is done. Even Gary was surprised how far I’d come already. Now I enter the phase where the loose ends get tidied up. Of course there will be loose ends that slip by regardless of my diligence.
When the switch gets thrown everything changes at once. The website moves from Chicago to the suburbs of Philadelphia. Some pieces will untestable until that moment. There is little chance to go back.
It’s all exciting and simultaneously daunting.
If you’d like to take a sneak peek it’s temporarily visible here. Comments welcome.
¹ – Around a year ago I went to Karl Rove’s website while following a news story. Rove is not my cup of tea, but his website was really well done. No more. It is a perfect example of how tightness goes away with time. Pieces have been added that don’t fit.
It’s tough to look at the site and think I once used it as a model of what I wanted.
Both Drudge and The Huffington Post have linked to an op-ed piece in the Financial Times. It’s written by former Bush insider Karl Rove.
It is advice to Barack Obama. It claims to be a game plan for Obama to win the Democratic nomination.
What is this, a Twilight Zone episode?
Why would Rove would do anything to benefit Democrats?
It is widely suggested, Hillary Clinton runs the poorest of all the major Democrats versus a generic Republican candidate. Wouldn’t Senator Clinton be the Republican’s first choice for Democratic nominee?
My first thought was, maybe Rove is trying to torpedo Clinton’s closest rival? However, when you read the suggestions, they make perfect sense from a strategic standpoint. They would help Obama.
Maybe Rove just hates Hillary or the Clintons in general and will accept any choice instead of her?
The whole thing is a real puzzle. I can’t remember anything quite like this before. And the election is still a year away.
For the past few weeks I have been following (here and here), with great interest, stories about White House staffers using non-governmental email accounts while discussing government business on ‘company’ time. Obviously, that makes them somewhat more difficult to find (especially if people searching didn’t know there was any off site email to begin with).
It seemed like such an explosive story… but there’s hardly any buzz.
The LA Times seems to be carrying the water on this. Wednesday evening they added:
The White House said today that it may have lost what could amount to thousands of messages sent through a private e-mail system used by political guru Karl Rove and at least 50 other top officials, an admission that stirred anger and dismay among congressional investigators.
I hate it when email gets lost. It’s so
This story has been bubbling for a while – weeks now. Will it graduate to the big leagues? Who knows. It’s funny how some stories ooze out as opposed to break out.
It still looks like a big story to me.